This is one of the most thoughtful and well-rounded reports I’ve received. Your team went beyond the surface to explore coercive control from multiple angles — psychological, cultural, legal, and media-based — and you made an especially strong effort to connect those insights back to real people’s lived experiences. What sets your paper apart is your attempt to define culturally specific archetypes, like The Caudillo and La Madre Anegada. That is exactly the kind of contribution we need if we want to make the FIA model global. You clearly understood that coercive control isn't just about relationships — it's about the systems and cultural narratives that normalize power and silence. Your media analysis was another standout: detailed, emotionally attuned, and full of pattern recognition. You showed how coercive control is often romanticized or misrepresented — and why that matters. Also, your legal comparison between Colombia and Brazil added real-world depth and showed that you were thinking across systems, not just theories. Some areas to grow would be defining your archetypes more behaviorally (what do they do to control others?), tightening up the writing in your intro, and distinguishing more clearly between personal vs. systemic coercion. But overall, this is powerful work with real-world relevance — and it shows a level of insight that goes beyond the typical undergraduate paper. I'm genuinely impressed. Keep going — you’re helping to build something meaningful.